Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:09

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Cocaine Sharks: The Disturbing Discovery That’s Shaking Marine Research - Indian Defence Review
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do flat-Earthers think the Earth is flat?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
In bed, not in music, which is better, a drummer or a bass player?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do you find out who your handler is as a targeted individual?